Startups Stack Exchange Archive

When exactly can a company/startup go full remote?

I know there are a lot of questions about remote working. However, this one is different.

Generally, there is a notion which says that the bonding between the first 10 members of the company is very important.

So, can a startup be full-remote from the #3 employee (2 are co-founders) and still have that bond and speed which the startups who have their first employees in the same office/dorm?

Is it advisable? Or is there an advised time/size//milestone after which a company can go full-remote and keep enjoying the same pace of growth as the ones which aren’t?

Why I want to go full-remote?
Simply due to the multiple advantages of the full-remote team structure.

Answer 9484

This is primarily opinion based question, but actually in the current work environment in the UK and Australia (and other countries), a higher and higher percentage of workers are moving to fully or partially remote working, so I think this is an important question.

That being said, I think there are some basic things that can assist or detract from building a team of remote workers that are effective as a team.

Here are some aspects of “team” that can be potentially lost or diluted by full or partial remote working.

You say

there is a notion which says that the bonding between the first 10 members of the company is very important.

I can see the logic in that, but I’d tweak it slightly and say that the bonding between any members of a team, like the management team is critical, so when new members come in, their inclusion is very important to have a effective working relationship.

In some ways you could say that any team that works closely together would need that extra bond to be as effective as they can be.

Some experiences

Answer 9509

I rarely see companies offering remote positions. When it happens it’s for some logistical or political reason, usually not a legitimate one.

For example, one company I worked for had a CEO in Bellevue and a cofounder in the Bay Area. Because the team was already dispersed and the CEO perceived (wrongly, in my opinion) that renting multiple office spaces or consolidating the company would be too hard, we were 100% remote.

There have also been nepotism cases where certain people aren’t really expected to show up for work.

Lastly, if the role requires a lot of teleconferencing or travel, companies may think it’s easier to go remote than to properly organize their operations.

In programming, there are few legitimate reasons to offer remote positions. If people aren’t being watched then they’re going to spend all day playing video games.


All content is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.