funding
, venture-capital
, seed
, fundraising
, board
Is there a fundamental difference between “seed funding” and “series A”? What’s the DEFINITION?
The following seem to be oft-repeated but incorrect definitions:
Source of funding (friends and family vs. pros): Counterexample: Y-combinator calls its funding “seed”.
The amount (less than vs. greater than about $1M): Counterexample: a company I know that raised $3M and called it “seed”.
First round vs. second: Counterexample: any company that skipped “seed” and only raised “series A”. Likewise, I think there are companies that raise multiple “seed” rounds.
Are there any differences in how the law treats the two rounds, or how the board seats are distributed?
(This question is about USA/California, if that makes any difference)
Great Question!
Thank you for asking.
I will try and answer your questions first. I will quote them and answer below
Are there any differences in how the law treats the two rounds, or how the board seats are distributed?
This industry, just like finance, has its own internal standards and their are no "set" definitions or standards like the IEEE, FOR DEFINITIONS OF FINANCING UNLESS THE FIRM/PERSON REQUIRES YOU TO FILE A FORM D.
The definition of a seed investment will vary somewhat depending on whom you ask. It would not be unusual for someone to refer to a larger friends and family financing as a seed financing. However, the term seed financing usually denotes a company’s first round of financing from third party investors who regularly invest in startup companies. These investors are typically individual angel investors, formal angel organizations or even venture capital funds. Seed investments are usually made through a mix of equity and loans, or sometimes convertible loan notes (often with a cap on the conversion value – see also The (Troublesome) Convertible Note Cap), simplified (short form) “series seed” financing documents or (often if led by a VC) “full” Series A style investment documents (see below). The structure selected for the investment will depend on investor preference and the availability of tax incentives, and will be influenced by the amount raised. As a general matter it is fair to say that the larger the amount raised, the more likely that the investors will use more formal and detailed investment documents. Subject to the caveats above, investment amounts under USD/EUR 1,000,000 or so > will often use convertible notes or Series Seed investment documentation.
..how the board seats are distributed?
Source of funding (friends and family vs pros): Counterexample: Y-combinator calls its funding "seed".
..."seed"
By definition seed money or seed capital is the money an investor would put in your young business in exchange for equity stakes in your company. In most cases you would raise the seed money from your family, friends or people you know personally and this money would go towards covering the initial expense of your company.
On the other hand, the Series A round, usually goes into expanding your business, running a comprehensive marketing campaigning and also being aggressive with the pricing. Here you need to keep in mind two important things – Pre-Money Valuation which is what your company is valued at which is 3 million (as per the Seed Funding example) and the Post Money Valuation which is Pre-Money Valuation plus what you raise from the investors. Let’s assume you are able to get a funding 1 million through Series A Funding your valuation would now stand at 4 million.
Seeds funding is the first fund you get for your startup, This money should help you in the initail stage of the startup, In many times seed fund helps the startup to get few employees, build and launch an early product.
Series A funding, usually will come after you have the early version of the product and you need to optimaize it. Typically, In series A funding you will raise more money then from seeds funding, and the money should help the company to figure out a business model and ways to optimize the product.
Q: Are there any differences in how the law treats the two rounds?
The distinction is merely semantic, and any material differences are merely contractual. (i.e. the terms of the deal are decided between the investors and investees.)
Q: Are there any differences in how the board seats are distributed?
Again, this is purely contractual. It all comes down to what the different rounds of investors want in return for their investment, and the perceived value and health of the company.
(If the startup is doing well, the investee has all the power, but if the startup is struggling, the investors have all the power and their stipulations will be draconian.)
What investors are going to be interested in from a legal standpoint is the operating agreement or by-laws, and the terms of any deal are solely between the investor and investee.
What the government cares about is the type of corporate entity for tax purposes.
All content is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.