Firearms Stack Exchange Archive

What are the differences in cavitation and penetration of different bullet types

I’d like to know the differences in cavitation and penetration of these types of bullets:
Ballistic Tip
Soft Point
Hollow Point
FMJ

I can find ballistic info on each of these, but can’t find a good reference for the ballistic tip or soft point (I can for fmj and jhp)

Answer 317

Edited to Add: Regarding the elk hunting example, using an expanding bullet of some sort (hollowpoint or soft point) rather than FMJ, would provide additional terminal effect and be more likely to put the animal down quickly. On game the size of an elk, you would want to use a bullet designed for controlled expansion (such as a Barnes TSX, Nosler Partition, or Hornady SST), not something like a varmint bullet designed for very rapid expansion (such as the Barnes Varmint Grenade or Hornady V-MAX).

Within the controlled expansion category, the main difference between a soft point, hollowpoint, and a ballistic tipped hollowpoint is going to be their performance at longer range. Soft point bullets with lots of exposed lead are not particularly aerodynamic and are notoriously inconsistent at longer ranges because the exposed soft lead tip can be damaged or distorted during the loading process. This doesn't really matter if you're hunting in thick brush and will be taking the shot at close range, but in more open areas where a several hundred yard shot is a possibility, a softpoint may not be the best choice. Controlled expansion hollowpoints are generally more aerodynamic and accurate at longer ranges, and a ballistic tip can improve this even further (but remember that not all ballistic tipped bullets are designed for controlled expansion).


All content is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.