lent
, customs
, rites
For nonbelievers there is obviously not much sense in having a time of reflection about our belief in a god. Still, can’t Lent be also a time of constructive self-examination without a belief in a deity?
I have a few friends (some of them non-religious) who practice various forms of abstinence during Lent and I am very uncertain how to parse their behaviour; I am alternatingly torn between incredulity, annoyance, and grudging respect.
By the way, I don’t mean by this that we should be fasting, giving up our favourite food for a time. But rather that we try in general to take a step back from our usual life and re-examine what we take for granted.
Related: Is there any scientific evidence either supporting or opposing Lenten abstinence?.
score: 2
I don’t think there is anything wrong with a 40 day fast for health reasons; these days a lot of people could use to do a lot less eating. And 40 days of low calorie intake based on simple foods is certainly not a health risk as long as you don’t neglect one food group.
I also don’t think there is anything wrong with a 40 day period of introspection. Again, this is beneficial in a number of ways…I know I personally tend to bury issues that I have under my day-to-day schedule, and then they surface at inconvenient times. Better to stop and reflect at intervals.
One of the beneficial aspects of religion is forcing people to do these things (which are good for them) in an arbitrary way that cannot be gainsayed. Why should I do this? GOD WISHES IT SO.
So yea, I think it’s beneficial. I don’t think, however, that people tend to do unpleasant things, even if they are beneficial without some kind of reason.
All content is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.